As per a new entry in the company’s product roadmap, Teams will soon allow administrators to remove “inappropriate” or tangential content in messaging channels. Presumably, this includes swearing words, lewdness, aggressive language and the like.

The feature is supposedly built with Teams for Education users in mind but will be made available across all iterations of the software later this month.

• Here’s our list of the best video conferencing software around
• We’ve built a list of the best business webcams right now
• Check out our list of the best headsets for conference calls on the market

Microsoft Teams update

In an online learning context, the value of the new Teams feature is obvious; teachers tasked with keeping rowdy students in line remotely will welcome all the help they can get. The chat management facility will work hand-in-hand with similar in-meeting tools, which allow hosts to disable video feeds, and mute or evict disruptive attendees.

However, outside of e-learning scenarios, the feature is bound to rub a few users up the wrong way. If the Basecamp controversy is anything to go by, some won’t take kindly to a facility that allows administrators to censor chat content and decide what qualifies as appropriate or not.

The feature is also likely to create opportunities for miscommunication. The messaging channel format is designed to create a permanent log of conversations around a particular topic. But the ability to delete messages will create holes in this history that could eliminate important context.

Presumably, Microsoft will opt for a system whereby deleted messages are replaced with an explanatory note, though the company has offered no specifics as yet. And admittedly, Slack already employs a similar system, whereby administrators decide who has the power to delete chat messages.

The risk, then, is determined by the way in which each individual business decides to deploy these new administrator privileges.

There’s an old myth that says “you can tell the quality of a good Windows update by whether it falls on an odd or even number”. However, it looks as though Microsoft wants to bring back Windows Vista for a new audience, and it seems like it could be on the right track, as long as communication with users is clear.

The good cop, bad cop routine

If you were following news of Windows almost twenty years ago, there’s a good chance you would have heard about Longhorn. This was the sequel to Windows XP, released in 2001, which would bring a whole load of next-generation features, such as:

• A new look called Slate
• A new file system to replace Explorer codenamed WinFS (Windows Future Storage)
• 3D effects across the user interface

However, development was reset in 2005, with many features, including WinFS, scrapped. What we got was, unfortunately, a bloated release in late 2006 in the form of Windows Vista, with widgets (called Gadgets in Vista) that were barely useful for the desktop, with a huge installation size for its time as well as an Aero interface that demanded a lot from many graphics cards than what was needed – and that’s not even the whole list of complaints.

This was known as the sixth version of Windows, so some users weren’t holding out much hope for this update anyway, and their doubts were only proven when Vista was not well received. It wasn’t long until Windows 7 arrived in 2009 to a more positive reception.

However, while Vista brought a lot of baggage, it did have potential at the time. For all of its troubled development and bloated features, it hinted at something more. While Windows 8 was the true fork in the road with its huge start screen and the desktop relegated to a tile, Vista was a trier.

Windows Vista 2.0

Most of the reception to Windows 11 has been positive, especially as Microsoft were adamant in 2015 that there would not be a Windows 11 or 12. While the upcoming update of Windows 10, called ‘Sun Valley’ was showcasing some redesigned icons and explorer windows, Windows 11 looks to be a substantial update, justifying the name.

If Windows 11 proves anything, it’s that the last few months have shown me that the reception of Windows Vista could have been so much better if the development went smoother, and the communication was once again clearer. Both Vista and 11 are two sides of the same coin to me – both with similar aims, but with muddled communication from Microsoft.

The company should clear up the confusion of the processor requirements and TPM fast. Even almost two weeks since the announcement, we’re not crystal clear on just which PCs are eligible for an update.

Windows Vista showed promise but faltered at the last hurdle with a bungled rollout, high system requirements and a bloated operating system. Windows 11 shows even more promise, but risks tripping up if Microsoft still isn’t clear as to whether TPM will really matter once it’s released later this year.

As Star Trek’s Mister Spock once said, in a twist to his catchphrase: ‘The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.” And it seems like Microsoft may be relying on its high-end users here to update to Windows 11, even at the expense of more casual users who don’t update their machines every year and may miss out on a useful update such as Windows 11.

Microsoft has been known to learn from their past mistakes, such as Windows 8 and the announcement of the Xbox One. But with the release of Windows 11 already looming, users will be looking to see if the company will release clearer information on how to upgrade their machines, and avoid the repeat of Windows Vista.